E1: 31P: Total Cost (ECST) in ETO Related Parts List Does not Match Extended Cost (AEXP.F4311) in ETO Related Purchase Order
(Doc ID 2828394.1)
Last updated on DECEMBER 15, 2021
Applies to:
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Engineer to Order - Version 9.2 and laterInformation in this document applies to any platform.
Symptoms
Currently, wrong Total Cost (ECST) is populated in ETO parts list (P3111) after creating a project related purchase order from ETO parts list. As a result, the difference between Total Cost (ECST) and Extended Cost (AEXP.F4311) happens.
Total Cost (ECST) is calculated by Unit Cost Override (EA.F3111) * Order Quantity.
Extended Cost (AEXP.F4311) is calculated by Unit cost (PRRC.F4311) * Order Quantity.
As Unit Cost Override (EA.F3111) has CURRENCY class as DD Item Class, currency decimal point of the Unit Cost Override depends on currencies. When currency is JPY (Japanese Yes) which doesn't have decimal points, the following discrepancy between Total Cost (ECST) and Extended Cost (AEXP.F4311) occurs.
For example:
- Unit cost in Cost File (F4105) is 1.500
- Quantity is 2EA
Total Cost (ECST) is 4 = Unit Cost Override (EA.F3111) 2 * Order Quantity 2
Extended Cost (AEXP.F4311) is 3 = Unit cost (PRRC.F4311) 1.500 * Order Quantity 2
Total Cost (ECST) in project related parts list (P3111) should be as same amount as Extended Cost (AEXP.F4311) of project related purchase order to avoid discrepancy of total cost.
Changes
Cause
To view full details, sign in with your My Oracle Support account. |
|
Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started! |