Does Read-Only Extend Clients Require KeyAssociator Implementation? (Doc ID 2624962.1)

Last updated on FEBRUARY 29, 2024

Applies to:

Goal

The customer architecture is using the clients as read only clients (CQC), the data in the caches is inserted/updated by a disabled storage cluster-member process and the clients are just CQC clients. As per the <Note 1434293.1> and the explanation in the documentation page leads to believe that when the clients are just performing read operations the KeyAssociator implementation in the client should not be needed. Could you confirm if this understanding is right or else should the KeyAssociator implementation be added as well for read-only remote clients?

Just to clarify it, the customer is inserting data into the cache using a storage-disabled member of the Coherence cluster (i.e. not a coherence client) and then the clients (CQC clients) just query the data from the cache. In this scenario and given the key associator is defined in the cache config the expectation is user needs to set defer-key-association to true. If the customer wants to set the defer-key-association to false then user should have the key associator defined in the client, remove the key associator definition in the cache config in the server side.

Solution

My Oracle Support provides customers with access to over a million knowledge articles and a vibrant support community of peers and Oracle experts.