Unexpected Tax Entries In General Ledger Reporting (Doc ID 1069712.1)

Last updated on MARCH 29, 2023

Applies to:

Symptoms

The understanding from the documentation is that the taxcode (a single one: CST) has to be provided in the GLID definition.

The expectation is that for each event, such as purchase fee, for which the charges are applied, the corresponding tax should also be displayed in the same GLID.

For example, for mobile sales with GLID = 102145, the expectation is that the tax corresponding with this event should be reported in the tax entry for GLID 102145.

However, this is not happening. As all the products have the same taxcode CST configured, BRM is putting the tax in GLID 100100, that is the GLID where the tax CST occurs for the first time in pin_glid.

Reproduction steps :

1) the taxcode is defined for 13% tax (taxcode_map file):

As seen, the tax amount is appearing on GLID 100100, in place of the expected 102145.

Changes

Cause

My Oracle Support provides customers with access to over a million knowledge articles and a vibrant support community of peers and Oracle experts.