Why Do You Get an Unexpected Payment Runoff Amount with a Payment Pattern?
Last updated on DECEMBER 07, 2017
Applies to:Oracle Financial Services Funds Transfer Pricing - Version 5.6 and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.
Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications (OFSAA)
For Oracle Financial Service Funds Transfer Pricing (FTP), when using a Payment Pattern and a "Cash Flow" Transfer Pricing Method, why is the Payment Runoff (FE 190) a positive value for the first Cash Flow Date? All other Payment Runoff values are negative. Why are you getting an unexpected Payment Amount for the first Cash Flow Date?
Example of data from FSI_O_PROCESS_CASH_FLOWS:
|Cash Flow Date||FINANCIAL_ELEM_ID||FLOAT_VALUE|
The very first FE 190 value is positive but all subsequent values are negative. Why does this inconsistency exist?
Sign In with your My Oracle Support account
Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started
Million Knowledge Articles and hundreds of Community platforms