Why Do You Get an Unexpected Payment Runoff Amount with a Payment Pattern? (Doc ID 1597899.1)

Last updated on NOVEMBER 13, 2013

Applies to:

Oracle Financial Services Funds Transfer Pricing - Version 5.6 and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.
Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications (OFSAA)

Goal

For Oracle Financial Service Funds Transfer Pricing (FTP), when using a Payment Pattern and a "Cash Flow" Transfer Pricing Method, why is the Payment Runoff (FE 190) a positive value for the first Cash Flow Date?  All other Payment Runoff values are negative.  Why are you getting an unexpected Payment Amount for the first Cash Flow Date?

Example of data from FSI_O_PROCESS_CASH_FLOWS:

Cash Flow DateFINANCIAL_ELEM_IDFLOAT_VALUE
10-Nov-2011 190 2301.369863
10-Nov-2011 430 -2301.369863
10-Dec-2011 190 -3462.250328
10-Dec-2011 430 -1765.749672
10-Jan-2012 190 -3465.143375
10-Jan-2012 430 -1762.856625

The very first FE 190 value is positive but all subsequent values are negative.  Why does this inconsistency exist?

Solution

Sign In with your My Oracle Support account

Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started

My Oracle Support provides customers with access to over a
Million Knowledge Articles and hundreds of Community platforms