Release of Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management 7.5 Patch Set 21
(Doc ID 2392069.1)
Last updated on JUNE 15, 2023
Applies to:
Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management - Version 7.5.0.0.0 to 7.5.0.20.0 [Release 7.5.0]Information in this document applies to any platform.
Details
Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management 7.5 Patch Set 21 (7.5.0.21.0) is released on 26 April 2018.
This announcement lists the enhancements and fixes delivered in Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management (BRM) 7.5 Patch Set 21.
Patch ID: <Patch 27603295>
Key Enhancements
Delay Interval Can be Configured for Resolving Failed Payments
In previous releases, when the pin_recover utility and a custom application were run in parallel to resolve failed credit card or debit card payments, duplicate transaction IDs were created for such transactions.
With this patch, a new entry, event_search_delay, has been introduced in the BRM_home/apps/pin_billd/pin.conf file to specify the delay interval for resolving failed payments. You can now run the pin_recover utility with event_search_delay to delay the search of events so that pin_recover processes only the events that were created before the specified delay interval.
BRM 7.5 Is Now Certified with Perl 5.26.1
With this patch set, BRM 7.5 is certified with Perl 5.26.1.
For more information, see BRM Documentation.
Summary of fixes to customer-reported tickets delivered in 7.5 Patch Set 21
SR Number |
Bug Number |
Issues Fixed |
3-15808938171 |
27067418 |
When using Conversion Manager for loading data, the parent account and account receivable details could not be provided at bill-unit level. This was causing issues if the account had multiple bill units. |
3-15600725291 |
27159334 |
The audit data retrieved from the database was not in the correct order. As a result, the rerating process was not creating charging events. |
3-16022883521 |
27159379 |
When setting the discount validity dates on cycle boundaries, the discount validity rules were not considered for calculation and this resulted in incorrect discounts. |
3-16016616727 |
27178505 |
Rerating was failing for usage events created on the billing day. |
3-15943051481 |
27181444 |
For hierarchical accounts, bill-level adjustments were not getting synchronized with ECE properly. |
3-16117097141 |
27183213 |
The value for the StopBillClosedAccounts business parameter was always getting set to 1 irrespective of the value specified. |
3-16240915721 |
27199236 |
When applying cycle discounts, full discounts could not be applied due to incorrect discount start dates set by the set_discountinfo opcode. |
3-15979537621 |
27202234 |
When accounts had hierarchical bill units, account deletion was failing. |
3-15997352581 |
27213532 |
When the fetch size reached the maximum limit, the pin_bill_accts utility reported a performance issue. |
3-15695482521 |
27226302 |
In BRM, it was possible to allocate the same adjustment to a bill twice. |
3-15233536061 |
27244351 |
There was no option to disable journal creation for zero (0) balance records. |
3-16380399871 |
27252301 |
Launching Customer Center with Java WebStart had issues due to the version mismatch between the shipped version (4.5.3) and the version specified (4.4) in the orasoft.jnlp file. |
3-16228876211 |
27266271 |
When PDC was used for configuring pricing objects, there was some issue in the Item Type Selector configuration due to format mismatch. |
3-16013792861 |
27274073 |
The discount purchase operation was not considering the appropriate rate plan resulting in incorrect calculation of the discount period. |
3-16186268621 |
27277543 |
When a service configured to have only discounts was terminated, an error was thrown. |
3-16386155841 |
27304026 |
Even if the log level was set to ERROR, some debug messages were getting recorded in the log files. |
3-16335738541 |
27309568 |
The input data for the payment policy opcode, PCM_OP_PYMT_POL_PRE_REFUND, did not contain all the required information for policy processing. |
3-16344647651 |
27309572 |
The pin_deposit utility was not collecting pre-authorized charges. |
3-16407795601 |
27323287 |
In Customer Center, when the permission to access account receivables (/accounttool/araccess) was set to read-only, the customer service representative (CSR) was not able to view the adjustment details from the Bill Details or Item Details page. |
3-16103454181 |
27337655 |
When making adjustments, if the adjustment amount was more than the actual due amount, an inconsistent behavior was observed. |
3-13406072941 |
27362563 |
In multischema systems, after the service transfer, the /uniqueness object was created with the POID of the secondary database instead of the primary database. |
3-15683377181 |
27369058 |
If the sequential discounting was enabled, the system-level discount if configured, was not applied for cycle arrear events. |
3-15833122031 |
27380777 |
There was an issue with state enumerations that was causing a core failure in BRM. |
3-15728021501 |
27408003 |
Customer Center was not supporting the customization of the Account Navigator class. Customer Center has been enhanced to support this customization. |
3-15832032811 |
27415115 |
Rerating events after changing the accounting cycle day of month (DOM) was incorrectly impacting the balances. |
3-16323836501 |
27418545 |
The PCM_OP_COLLECTIONS_CALC_AGING_BUCKETS opcode was not considering the latest or current hierarchy to calculate the amount due from aging buckets. |
3-16634162461 |
27448145 |
When the billing delay was configured, auto-triggered billing from ECE was generating a final bill instead of a partial bill. |
3-16264990561 |
27507370 |
When a product configured with the cycle arrear event was cancelled with a backdated date, the refund was not applied properly. |
3-16547489391 |
27523583 |
Rerating after purchasing a discount was not working as expected. |
3-16250465901 |
27523591 |
When a child account was moved under a parent account, the usage charges were not included in the correct bill. |
3-14581820771 |
27527125 |
Even after cancelling a discount, it remained active and also the discounted amount was not reversed until the end of the current cycle. |
3-16628324941 |
27539378 |
In some cases, while disconnecting a service, the PCM_OPCUST_SET_STATUS opcode was entering a deadlock. |
3-15870945191 |
27539384 |
If sequential discounting was enabled, the subscription discounting was getting applied on top of the system-level discount. This was causing errors in some scenarios. |
3-16424349221 |
27552473 |
During rerating, additional tax balance impacts were created. As a result, the adjustment calculated was incorrect. |
3-16850439811 |
27554937 |
In Cutomer Center, the posted date in the Item Details page was incorrect. |
NA |
27577924 |
When the credit limit threshold was breached, the authorization was granted for the amount more than the available balance. |
3-15405314431 |
27584540 |
Payment Tool was crashing when an offline payment was allocated for written-off accounts. |
3-16395624221 |
27606734 |
If the cycle DOM for a deactivated service was updated and the service was reactivated after the delay period, duplicate events were retrieved and refunded during the product cancellation. |
3-16653172661 |
27613632 |
During cancellation of a product configured with in-advance billing, incorrect START_T and END_T were set in the events. |
3-17005468741 |
27677138 |
There was a memory issue reported when calling the PCM_OP_ACT_USAGE opcode with a large input flist. |
3-16813237871 |
27745488 |
When the EventAdjustmentDuringcancellation flag was enabled, the flist data corruption issue occurred intermittently, which was dumping core. |
3-15223564141 3-15882582121 |
26557885 27389700 |
Web Services Manager was returning the Cannot intialize error when triggering the opcodes. |
3-15224841731 |
26810955 27168883 |
When the tiered taxation was applied, the tax information was consolidated instead of keeping it separate for each tier. |
3-15903641491 3-16506227591 |
27613610 27613616 |
Rated Event Loader (pin_rel) was exiting due to the out of memory error. |
SR Number |
Bug Number |
Issues Fixed |
3-15485573861 |
26608782 |
In Billing Care, in the Payment Details dialog box, the payment allocation table was not aligned properly. |
3-16877587301 |
27123466 |
In Billing Care, it was not possible to customize the Payment Suspense flow to display the last suspended date. Billing Care has been enhanced to support this customization. |
3-16426973211 |
27375507 |
In Billing Care, it was not possible to save the notes in the Payment Details dialog box when the amount was more than 999 and when the payment was added by using opcode. |
3-16877587301 |
27423360 |
In Billing Care, in the Payment Suspense interface, the account number link on the Audit Trail for the Moved to Suspense From entry was opening an incorrect account. |
3-16877587301 |
27500262 |
In Billing Care, the Make a Payment and Reverse Payment dialog boxes were not displaying the notes entered during payments and payment reversals respectively. |
3-16982060751 |
27698944 |
In Billing Care, a performance issue was reported while listing the deals during a product purchase operation. |
Actions
Contacts
To view full details, sign in with your My Oracle Support account. |
|
Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started! |
In this Document
Details |
Key Enhancements |
Summary of fixes to customer-reported tickets delivered in 7.5 Patch Set 21 |
Actions |
Contacts |
References |