Why Doesn't Gap Runoff FE 660 and 1660 Change Across Scenarios for Early Redemption Liability Products?
(Doc ID 2712815.1)
Last updated on JULY 26, 2023
Applies to:
Oracle Financial Services Asset Liability Management - Version 8.0.0 and laterInformation in this document applies to any platform.
Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications (OFSAA)
Oracle Financial Services Asset Liability Management (ALM)
Goal
You created three different ALM Processes with three different Prepayment / Early Redemption rates. For the Liabilities, why is Financial Element (FE) 1660 (Liquidity Gap Runoff) and FE 660 (Gap Runoff) the same across the Time Buckets for all 3 processes even though the Prepayment rates are different?
Solution
To view full details, sign in with your My Oracle Support account. |
|
Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started! |
In this Document
| Goal |
| Solution |
| References |