Accounts Inherit Parent's BILL_NO After Consolidation Whereas ITEM_NO is Unchanged
Last updated on SEPTEMBER 26, 2016
Applies to:Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management - Version 22.214.171.124.0 and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.
Checked for relevance on 19-Aug-2011.
***Checked for relevance on 29-Apr-2013***
-- Problem Statement:
When an account is moved from an individual hierarchy to a group hierarchy, the bill_no in the bill_t table is also changed to match the parent bill_no. Whereas, the item_no are still based on the original bill_no.
-- Steps To Reproduce:
1. Create an account (eg, account #10000) on July 20 (DOM=20)
2. Create another account (eg, account #20000 ) on Aug 1 (DOM=1)
3. Run pin_bill_day on Aug 20 --
/account #10000 is billed and bill (B1-17) is generated, and item (B1-17,1) is created.
4. Move /account 10000 into hierarchy on Aug 25 --
/account 20000 is parent, and /account 10000 is non-paying child
5. Run pin_bill_day on Sep 1 --
A bill (B1-19) is generated for /account 20000.
But when running pin_bill_day on Sep 1, bill B1-19 is generated and is updating the same bill poid to bill_t of /account 10000, i.e. BILL_NO is getting updated from B1-17 to B1-19. Whereas, the ITEM_NO still remains as B1-17,1 in the item_t table for this child /account 10000.
Sign In with your My Oracle Support account
Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started
My Oracle Support provides customers with access to over a
Million Knowledge Articles and hundreds of Community platforms