Incorrect Company Prefix, when integrating an ASN in WMS/MOM under 3PL
(Doc ID 2505209.1)
Last updated on DECEMBER 03, 2019
Applies to:Oracle Warehouse Management Enterprise Edition Cloud Service - Version 18 and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.
WMS on Cloud modality of a 3 PL
What is the standard behavior when integrating an ASN in WMS / MOM under the modality of a 3PL?
Under this scenario:
We have a Parent Company 00 and three companies No. 100, 200 and 300, respectively.
On 01/01/2019, the ASN No. EXAMPLE00009929_2 was generated in MOM, for the company number 100 whose purchase order is No. 99999, upon receiving the ANS, one of the No. 1000088888 of the sku did not come with LPN, De this way, the blind N ° CJP9999999990 was generated in the company No. 100 child.
The expected behavior is that ASN EXAMPLE0009929_2 joined MOM in the company with 100, but also came to the company with 300 (both companies are 100 and 300).
Also, considering that each company manages LPNs under unique prefixes according to each company:
Company are 100 prefix AAA
Company are 200 prefix BBB
Company are 300 prefix CCC
By using the prefix CCC in the receipt of company 100, may we crossing a non expected behavior (such as data corruption, incorrect item ocst, cost discrepancy)?
Based on that question, we created a new test using company 100 to CCC and retested, and the used ASN was integrated correctly.
Is this the correct way to work when integrating an ASN in WMS / MOM under the modality of a 3PL?
To view full details, sign in with your My Oracle Support account.
Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started!
In this Document