FA PERIOD IS NOT TIED BACK IN PROJECTS USING PRC: TIEBACK ASSET LINES FROM ORACLE ASSETS (Doc ID 1567068.1)

Last updated on MARCH 08, 2017

Applies to:

Oracle Project Costing - Version 12.1.3 and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.
***Checked for relevance on 26-JUN-2015***

Goal

As noted in <bug 13697900>, we have 62 project asset lines with the FA period missing with a Transferred status (FA_PERIOD_NAME is not populated in PA_PROJECT_ASSET_LINES_ALL for records with TRANSFER_STATUS_CODE of T). We just discovered this issue because we want to use the FA_PERIOD_NAME field in some Discoverer reports. The PRC: Tieback Asset Lines from Oracle Assets should be populating this data. In addition, we have 46 rejected lines with various rejection reasons and 39 pending records.

We would like the following:
1. A fix to populate the FA Period Name (and Asset Number for 2 of the records) for all project asset lines with a Transfer status.
2. Direction as to how the 46 rejected lines and 39 pending records should be fixed.

There is no workaround to address this data issue and we are unable to provide several reports the Business has requested that relies on this data.
 

Solution

Sign In with your My Oracle Support account

Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started

My Oracle Support provides customers with access to over a
Million Knowledge Articles and hundreds of Community platforms