Why Does OM Populate Invoicing_Rule_ID as -2 in AR Interface When Setup in OM is Null Rule? (Doc ID 1958685.1)

Last updated on DECEMBER 05, 2016

Applies to:

Oracle Order Management - Version 12.2.3 and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.
***Checked For Relevance 05-Dec-2016***

Goal

Summary of Issue
Incorrect Revenue Account > In OM Transaction Type, tested by assigning accounting rule as immediate and invoicing
rule as null. Still we can see invoicing_rule_id as -2 in ra_interface_lines_all. Is this expected behavior? We need invoicing
rule as Immediate. Let us know where exactly the users can define value 'Immediate' for Invoicing Rule.

Question 1: Understand that if users want to have invoicing_rule_id as null in ra_interface_lines_all, then we need to make
                  invoicing rule and immediate rule as null (Header and line transaction type). With this setup we can recognize
                  revenue Immediate. Correct me if I am wrong. Also, will this setup impact Customer Acceptance feature?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Question 2: Our next requirement is, we have few customers for whom we need to defer revenue. As per AR Transaction type,
                  users have deferred revenue (segment2) in our unearned revenue account. So, please let us know the exact steps
                  (do we need to assign invoicing rule & accounting rule at header or line level or both or is there any other setup) to
                  be defined in OM Transaction type?
 

Solution

Sign In with your My Oracle Support account

Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started

My Oracle Support provides customers with access to over a
Million Knowledge Articles and hundreds of Community platforms