Last updated on JUNE 28, 2016
Applies to:PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Project Costing - Version 9.2 and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.
On the PC_WC_UPV_VW view, it hardcoded PMBIL analysis Group.
1. Why it is hardcoded to PMBIL analysis group?
2. Will adding ACT resolve this issue?
3. Was PMBIL hardcode entered as a typo? Should it use other analysis group related to cost?
4. The tables used in the view are AP tables - PS_PYMNT_VCHR_XREF. The fields used in the view are AP fields - VOUCHER_ID, BUSINESS_UNIT_AP, etc. The nomenclature is AP specific - Vouchers, Payments, etc. And more importantly, the rows returned by the Pagelet are Project Resource rows that originated in AP. So it seems to be a mistake when using PMBIL Analysis Group
Sign In with your My Oracle Support account
Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started
Million Knowledge Articles and hundreds of Community platforms