ECA : Is There a Logical Reason Peoplesoft Is Designed to Use 2 Different Tables for the Tax Parameters Based on the Type Contract Line?
(Doc ID 2777868.1)
Last updated on MAY 26, 2021
Applies to:PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Contracts - Version 9.2 to 9.2 [Release 9]
Information in this document applies to any platform.
Is there a logical reason PeopleSoft is designed to use 2 different tables for the tax parameters based on the type contract line?
For fixed-fee billing plans, it uses the tax parameters on the billing plan. For rate-based (as-incurred) it uses the tax parameters on the CA_DETAIL table.
No matter the contract line type, they both have tax parameters on the CA_DETAIL table so wondering why they don't both use this table for sending tax parameters to billing.
To view full details, sign in with your My Oracle Support account.
Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started!
In this Document