ETL8.x & 9 Performance hit from Number of Months to Process field (Doc ID 622834.1)

Last updated on APRIL 21, 2016

Applies to:

PeopleSoft Enterprise HRMS Time and Labor - Version 8.3 to 9.1 [Release 8.3 to 9]
Information in this document applies to any platform.
´┐ŻEnterprise, Time and Labour, 8.3
***Checked for relevance on 23-Jul-2012***
***Checked for relevance on 23-Dec-2013***

This document was previously published as Customer Connection Solution 200769444


***Checked for relevance on 21-Aug-2009***


Symptoms

ISSUE:
Customer has just applied the bundle containing the new Number of Months to Process Field.  This is a feature they are not interested in and would like more information on this issue:

1. Is there a limit to the number of months entered since a number is required?
2. Their major concern is will there be a performance hit once this field is populated with a higher the number.
3. They have different needs for different companies. Has there been any thought to adding this field to the paygroup instead?
1. Is there a limit to the number of months entered since a number is required?
2. Their major concern is will there be a performance hit once this field is populated with a higher the number.
3. They have different needs for different companies. Has there been any thought to adding this field to the paygroup instead?

Cause

Sign In with your My Oracle Support account

Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started

My Oracle Support provides customers with access to over a
Million Knowledge Articles and hundreds of Community platforms