My Oracle Support Banner

CS 9.0Bundle 13/ CS 8.9 Bundle 20 (Regs 4 2010-2011) and Year Round Pell (Doc ID 856352.1)

Last updated on JANUARY 30, 2019

Applies to:

PeopleSoft Enterprise CS Financial Aid - Version 8.9 to 9 [Release 8.9 to 9]
Information in this document applies to any platform.
***Checked for relevance on 05-Jul-2012***

Purpose

The purpose of this FAQ is to address some common questions regarding the Year Round Pell functionality delivered with Regs 4 2010-2011.

Questions and Answers

To view full details, sign in with your My Oracle Support account.

Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started!


In this Document
Purpose
Questions and Answers
 Why doesn't the Update Pell Percent Used routine process locked awards?
 Why is the pell packaging routine calculating disbursement amounts with cents, and not honoring the award remainder rule option in FA item type setup?
 If a Disbursement Plan is used that includes leading Summer, but the student doesn't enroll in the summer, will COD accept $0 for the first disbursement on the record, or will the record reject?
 Can a 2011 EFC be used for a 2010 trailing summer term?
 COD reporting:  -- Is EFC being reported? If so, any way to report 2011 EFC?
 If Pell has already been disbursed in prior terms, and we repackage them for trailing summer term, what happens to those disbursed amounts?
 Is using the NSLDS PUSH process now required for Pell?
 If a school did not previously use Pell Aggregates before Bundles 13/20, how do all of the aggregate records get created for the previously awarded students, and is that step necessary?
 Does the Pell Percent Used routine create a Pell Aggregate row if one didn't exist before?
 What would cause Pell1 or Pell2 to award above the maximum scheduled amount for a term?
 Does Pell have to be awarded in one item type for all terms, or can separate item types be used for non-standard (summer) vs academic?
 What split code formula(s) should be used when awarding Pell?
 Can Pell be manually awarded for a different amount than the system wants to calculate?
 After validating changes made to other awards, the Pell is also unexpectedly being changed. Is there a way to prevent that?
 Re-Validating Pell for FA Load INCREASES Produces odd results. Specifically, if the load has changed on the first term (or first two terms of a three term award), that disbursement amount will be increased, but then the last disbursement amount will be decreased to stay within the total award amount which remains unchanged. Is this functionality working as designed?
References

My Oracle Support provides customers with access to over a million knowledge articles and a vibrant support community of peers and Oracle experts.