Why Does Reversal Of PO Receipt Populate Differently In REF_NO Fields?
(Doc ID 2975157.1)
Last updated on SEPTEMBER 19, 2023
Applies to:
Oracle Retail Merchandising Foundation Cloud Service - Version 19.3 and laterInformation in this document applies to any platform.
Goal
After a stock count is accepted and a late poll transaction of PO receipt is posted (with transaction_date < stock_take_date), the ORDER_RCV_SQL batch itself posts the reversal TC22, which takes care of the inventory negation.
In this situation, the REF_NO_1 contains the PO Number instead of the Stock Count Number, and the Tran_Date is same as the PO Receipt Date instead of the Stock Count Date.
Why are these PO receipts treated differently?
Solution
To view full details, sign in with your My Oracle Support account. |
|
Don't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started! |
In this Document
Goal |
Solution |
References |